Global Warming Update

Posted in Those Who Don't Know History..., Truth in the Details on March 10, 2008 by nedyounger
 
500 scientists and researchers gathered in New York over the weekend of February 29 – March 4, 2008 to participate in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change. They closed their business on March 4th by issuing the “Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change.”
 
Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change  
 
“Global warming” is not a global crisis

 

We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,

Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;

Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;

Recognising that the causes and extent of recently observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed ‘consensus’ among climate experts are false;

Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change. Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing, human suffering;

Noting that warmer weather is generally less harmful to life on Earth than colder:

Hereby declare:

That current plans to restrict anthropogenic CO2 emissions are a dangerous misallocation of intellectual capital and resources that should be dedicated to solving humanity’s real and serious problems.

That there is no convincing evidence that CO2 emissions from modern industrial activity has in the past, is now, or will in the future cause catastrophic climate change.

That attempts by governments to inflict taxes and costly regulations on industry and individual citizens with the aim of reducing emissions of CO2 will pointlessly curtail the prosperity of the West and progress of developing nations without affecting climate.

That adaptation as needed is massively more cost-effective than any attempted mitigation and that a focus on such mitigation will divert the attention and resources of governments away from addressing the real problems of their peoples.

That human-caused climate change is not a global crisis.

Now, therefore, we recommend –

That world leaders reject the views expressed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as well as popular, but misguided works such as “An Inconvenient Truth.”

That all taxes, regulations, and other interventions intended to reduce emissions of CO2 be abandoned forthwith.

Agreed at New York, 4 March 2008

 

Home-Schooling Declared Illegal in (People’s Republic of) California

Posted in Education, Family on March 10, 2008 by nedyounger

An article in the March 7, 2008 edition of the San Francisco Chronicle revealed that the California Second District Court of Appeals ruled that “California courts have held that under provisions in the Education Code, parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children.”

Read the San Francisco Chronicle article here.

Read the Second District Court of Appeals ruling here. 

This ruling will almost undaoubtedly be appealed to the California Supreme Court.

  

In Defense of John Hagee

Posted in Religion on March 5, 2008 by nedyounger

Recently, questions have been raised about John Hagee’s book “In Defense of Israel.” I have not read the book, but did find a You Tube video of Pastor Hagee’s own advertisement for the book.

 

I greatly respect Pastor Hagee and his work, especially his work refuting Replacement Theology and systemic anti-Semitism. Based upon this video alone, it appears that Pastor Hagee is rather confused about certain foundational biblical issues. I hope for the sake of Pastor Hagee and the whole body of Christ, who would suffer a loss if he “fell,” that this is just a huge misunderstanding; but it is hard to imagine a simple explanation for what appear to be profound errors.

Rick Joyner of Morningstar Ministries has written an excellent “Special Bulletin” regarding this issue. It can be read here.

 

Pastor Hagee has also issued a “Special Message” regarding this issue. It can be read here.

 

As I said, I would hope that this is just a huge misunderstanding that can be cleared up by simply clarifying what Pastor Hagee truly believes; or conversely, if it can be demonstrated that Pastor Hagee truly embraces false doctrine, that he will accept proper reproof and correction and be fully restored; the body of Christ needs him. I guess we’ll have to wait for Pastor Hagee’s revised edition to find out what he really believes.

What Would Obama Do? Barack Obama’s Sermon on the Mount

Posted in Family, Government, Religion on March 3, 2008 by nedyounger

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) told a crowd at Hocking College in Nelsonville, Ohio, Sunday that he believes the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew chapters 5-7) justifies his support for legal recognition of same-sex unions.

Hear the audio clip here.

Obama also dismissed the condemnation of homosexuality in the book of Romans as “an obscure” passage.

(26) For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: (27) And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of thewoman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. [Romans 1:27 KJV]
 
Apparently, he must consider the book of Leviticus even more obscure.
 
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. [Leviticus 18:22 KJV]
 
Undoubtedly, Obama somehow considers his interpretation to fall under the admonitions “do unto others” (Matthew 7:12) and “judge not, lest ye be judged” (Matthew 7:1), but conveniently ignores Matthew 5:19a “Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven,” and John 7:24 “… judge with righteous judgment.” Furthermore, he somehow has convinced himself (and seeks to convince others) that this is a truly Christian position that Jesus would have supported.
 
Legal remedies already exist for homosexuals that want to transfer property, visit one another in the hospital etc., without creating a privileged status for them equivalent to marriage, but without the label. Creating such a status would simply be an incremental step towards declaring homosexuality “legal” and “normal.” From this position, gay rights groups could file lawsuits, and the government would be free to crack down on any Christian minister with a 501(c)3 tax exempt status in order to shut them them up.
 
Ironically, Islam considers homosexuality a sin too, I wonder if 501(c)3 Imams and mosques will get shut up as well? Maybe one or two just for show, and then leave the rest alone.
 
Creating special rights for homosexuals (which is exactly what this is) will eventually lead to overthrowing the free exercise clause in the Bill of Rights; everyone is entitled to exercise their religion freely, except Christians who actually believe the Bible.  
 
 
 
 

   

The Debate Isn’t Over, It’s Just Beginning

Posted in Those Who Don't Know History..., Truth in the Details on February 21, 2008 by nedyounger

Opposition is very inconvenient for proponents of man-made global warming, that’s why they want to silence any dissent.

The simple fact is that most people with either a conscience and/or intellectual honesty know better than to engage in an argument when they don’t know all the facts, or at least don’t have the facts in front of them. Man-made global warming (MMGW) advocates play on this fact by making what appear to be authoritative statements claiming that the “debate is over” and that the (vast) majority of “experts” agree with them. Frankly speaking, I know that I have been in this situation many times; someone makes an authoritative statement, but I don’t know the field well enough or have the facts in front of me to engage them in debate; I don’t agree with their conclusions, but I can’t argue for lack of proper ammunition. Therefore, silence looks like consent.

In addition, MMGW advocates love to make statements declaring that dissenting opinion is categorically untrue. For example so-called “climate expert” Heidi Cullen of the Weather Channel believes that the American Meteorological Society shouldn’t certify any meteorologist that doesn’t adhere to MMGW. Although she tries to spin her statement to appear fair, the fact that she will not entertain any dissent whatsoever reveals what she really believes. Her opinion, given on her blog December 21, 2006 can be read here.

There are some heavy hitting dissenting opinions however; try John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, and former ABC weather man. Her calls MMGW a SCAM; you can read his original blog here, read his series of blogs here, read his opinion of the Weather Channel here, and an open letter to environmentalists here. But his best piece was when he spoke with Glenn Beck, which follows.

Maybe we can arrange a Celebrity Death Match bewteen John Coleman and Heidi Cullen. 

Then there’s Richard Lindzen, professor of meteorology at MIT. He wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal entitled “There Is No ‘Consensus’ on Global Warming, June 26, 2006; read the full article here.

For MMGW advocates, shamelessly promoting disaster scenarios conveniently shifts the focus away from the actual scientific facts, turning what should be a scientific discussion into an emotional meltdown.

  

Most people, especially non-scientists, simply don’t want to be bothered with actually having to learn and understand the science behind the MMGW claim and I don’t blame them; I know I have more important things to do with my time. But like I stated earlier, our silence can be misconstrued as consent, therefore we must at least learn a few facts in order to stop the MMGW steamroller. So let’s start here: the debate isn’t over, it’s just beginning; there is no consensus on global warming.

A Dangerous Precedent: Kosovo

Posted in Government, Religion, Those Who Don't Know History... on February 21, 2008 by nedyounger

On Sunday February 17, 2008, Kosovo declared its independence from Serbia, and was recognized by the European Union and the United States. This sets an enormously dangerous precedent; carving out of one nation a new nation where one did not exist before and had no rightful claim; and in addition handing it over to a people completely antithetical to the rightful inhabitants.

Since Sunday, Serbian protestors have marched in Pristina, angrily denouncing the United States and withdrawing their ambassador to the US.

Ethnic Albanians claim they are descended from the ancient Illyrians, and therefore the original inhabitants of Kosovo. As is often the case in claims of this nature, this argument only has real meaning if modern Albanians can: a) Establish and prove the date when they believe they were the legitimate occupiers of the area, and when they were illegitimately replaced. b) Prove that their descendents actually occupied that specific geographic area, not an adjacent one. c) Prove that it was the Serbs exclusively that displaced them, and not a series of conflicts, expulsions, occupations, etc, by the Serbs and others that deprived them of their land. d) Prove ethnic descent. d) Maintain a majority of ethnic purity and prove it. e) Demonstrate either: a significant degree of autonomous existence in the specified area, or consistent effort to re-establish your claim. f) Demonstrate due diligence for all of the above factors from the time of your expulsion until now.

Most, if not all of these facts are conveniently impossible to prove. Besides, there already is an independent Albania.

Today, the supposedly disbanded KLA (Kosovar Liberation Army), an Albanian organization, is engaged in terrorism, arms running, drug smuggling and human trafficking. Major figures in the KLA have documented links to Al-Qaeda, and Iran. The Kosovo economy is a joke with the majority of its citizens unemployed and therefore no way to feed their people without aid from (you guessed it) the United States and European Union. Furthermore, Albanian Muslims have engaged in systematic destruction of Serbian Christians sites, many centuries old, designed not only to eradicate all Serbian Christians, but any memory of their presence in Kosovo.

Several countries including Spain, Greece, Romania Russia and China have refused to recognize Kosovo on the grounds that this will embolden separatist movements in their countries.

The final and most regrettable part of this whole charade (hinted at earlier) is the precedent it sets. If the world entertained this bogus claim, who’s safe, and who’s next?

Answer: The West Bank and Jerusalem.

 

Churches in Kosovo.

besimi06v_s.jpg

burned-church-christ-the-sa.jpg

ca4.jpg

cathedral-of-the-holy-virgi.jpg

cathedral.jpg

Serbian Historical Background

Posted in Government, Religion, Those Who Don't Know History... on February 21, 2008 by nedyounger

In the latter half of the seventh century, several Slavic tribes began migrating from north-eastern Europe to the area between the Adriatic coast and the Danube River. These tribes spoke the same language, and included the Serbs, Croats, Slovenes, and Bosnians. By the latter half of the ninth century the Serbs became part of the Byzantine Empire and adopted Orthodox Christianity. The Slovenes and Croats adopted Roman Catholicism; and the Bosnians joined a heretical form of Christianity known as the Bogomilism. (The over-simplified explanation of the primary doctrine of the Bogomils is that God had two sons, Satan and Jesus.) Because of their heresy, the Bosnians/Bogomils were persecuted by both Orthodox and Roman Catholic Christians (Serbs and Croats).

An independent Serbian state existed as early as 850, but it was subordinate to Byzantine Empire. A stable and continuous Serbian state was established in the late twelfth and early thirteenth century along with the Serbian monarchy and the Serbian Orthodox Church.  As part of the Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire, the Serbians faced a long series of wars between Byzantium and the Russians, Bulgarians, Hungarians, Turks, and especially the Roman Catholic Church, that sought to bring Byzantium under Roman Catholic dominion as part of the Crusades (Fourth). In 1274 the Byzantine Emperor Michael conceded papal primacy to Gregory X. Soon after, in approximately 1300, Turkish conquest of the Balkan peninsula began in earnest.

On June 15, 1389, a battle was fought between the Serbs and invading Muslim Turks at Kosovo Field. Although the Turks won, the battle was and is looked upon by the Serbs as “the” milestone event of Serbian national identity (not that dissimilar to the Battle of Bunker Hill, or Lexington/Concord).

Due to the Turkish victory at Kosovo, large portions of real estate came under Turkish control, and significant numbers of people from a variety of local ethnic groups including Greeks, Italians, Jews, and the Slavic tribes “converted” to Islam; many clearly out of political and social expediency. Although the vast majority of Serbians did not convert, Serbia became a vassal state of the Turkish Empire nonetheless, forced to pay heavy taxes and provide troops to fight along side the Muslims. A large majority of ethnic Albanians, a non-Slavonic tribe indigenous to the Dalmatian coast, who had been Roman Catholic converted to Islam and became allied to the Ottoman Empire; while the Bosnians converted en masse, delighted to be free from orthodox Christian persecution and now part of the “winning team.” Croatiaand Slovenia however, were not overrun by the Turks, remained Roman Catholic and increasingly came under the authority of the Austrians.  

The Muslim threat to Eastern Europe was far from over and would continue for hundreds of years, eventually reaching the gates of Vienna in 1529, and again in 1683. Things began to change with the Turkish defeats at Vienna (1683) and Budapest (1686), which saw the beginning of the decline of Turkey and the ascendancy of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Yet it would take until 1826 before Serbia would wrestle full autonomy out of the Turks. By this time, Serbia had lived under almost 500 years of Islamic oppression. From the Muslim point of view, this era was one of “harmonious and peaceful co-existence,” demonstrating the moral and cultural superiority of shari’a and dhimmi. But for the Serbs it was a period of slaughter, slavery and subjugation.  

In the early to mid 1800’s Russia entered the fray and a period of “Pan-Slavism” began; an ideology that linked all Slavic peoples under the “protection” of Russia. This would last until World War I.

The Balkan Wars of 1912–13 drove the last remnants of the Ottoman Empire from Europe for good. As part of the Treaty that ended the war, Albania was made an independent state.

As most people are aware, World War I was set in motion in the Balkans, when Serbian national Gavrilo Princip assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austrian throne, in Sarajevo on June 28, 1914.

In 1915, ethnic Albanians allied to the Turks, killed 200,000 Serbs parallel to the Armenian genocide 

During World War I, the Slovenes, Bosnians and Croats allied themselves with Germany/Austria, while Serbia, Bulgaria, Romania, and Greece allied themselves with Russia, which would in turn ally itself with England, France and eventually the United States.

With the end of World War I, the defeat of the German-Austrian alliance, and the disintegration of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Macedonia and Montenegro became independent republics. Since all were Slavic peoples, and spoke Serbo-Croatian, they decided to join together to form one united country. This is despite the fact that Slovenia and Croatia were Roman Catholic, Serbia and Montenegro were Orthodox Christian, and Bosnia was Muslim.  

Then of course came World War II. The Nazi war machine quickly overran Yugoslavia and dissolved it back into its component states. This situation was agreeable to the Catholic Croats and Slovenes and Muslim Bosnians. The Serbs however, fought back. As a result, they received the focused attention of the Nazis with active assistance from the Croats. Terrible atrocities were committed against the Serbs with over 500,000 dying in Nazi-Croatian concentration camps. The Nazis also formed specialized units of Muslim fighters made up of Bosnians, Albanians and Arab Muslims from Palestine (like the 13th (Hanjar) Waffen SS Division). In addition, the ethnic cleansing of the Serbs by the Nazis was accompanied by deliberately moving thousands of Muslim Albanians into Kosovo province.

Following World War II, Yugoslavia was re-united under the leadership of Communist Josip Broz Tito. Tito, an ethnic Croat, believed he could use Communism to end the ethnic and religious antagonism between the various Slavic factions. As part of his plan, Tito took land from Serbia and gave it to the other Yugoslavian states, including land that had belonged to Serbia for over 1300 years (given to Bosnia and Croatia). Tito also gave land confiscated from the Serbian Orthodox Church to Albanian Muslims, and encouraged the Islamization of Serbian lands.The iron fist of Communism did little to genuinely solve the latent ethnic hostilities of Yugoslavia.

When Tito died 1980 Yugoslavia again fractured into its constituent parts. Bosnia and Croatia had little intention of giving any land back to Serbia however. Croatia began ethnic cleansing of Serbs from “their” land, and Bosnia declared all Serbs in “their” land Bosnian citizens with added intent of making Bosnia an Islamic fundamentalist state. A half a million ethnic Serbs fled Croatia and Bosnia; war ensued with the Serbs fighting for what they perceived as land that rightfully belonged to them; which brings us back to Kosovo.

Kosovo, and its capital Pristina, are the heart and soul of Serbia. They are what New England, with Boston, New York, Philadelphia and Washington D.C., are to the United States; or what Jerusalem and Judea are to Israel. Pristina has been the home of the Serbian Orthodox Church for close to 1000 years, with over 1000 churches, monasteries and holy places. To take Kosovo from the Serbs and give it to ethnic Albanian Muslims to make into an Islamic state is an injustice of biblical proportions. And yet that is precisely what the rest of the world insisted on, with NATO and the United States bombing Serbia into submission in two and half months in the spring of 1999.

The world justified its actions by accusing Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic of genocide. Post-war census figures however, reveal that the numbers killed were of no greater percentage than most wars; ugly yes, but no more so than what has been done to them. Conversely, since 1999, the ethnic cleansing and expulsion of Serbs from their ancestral home is almost complete with only 120,000 Serbs remaining; Kosovo is now conveniently over 90% Albanian Muslims.

On Sunday February 17, 2008, Kosovo declared its independence from Serbia, and was recognized by the European Union and the United States. This sets an enormously dangerous precedent; carving out of one nation a new nation where one did not exist before and had no rightful claim; and in addition handing it over to a people completely antithetical to the rightful inhabitants.

Since Sunday, Serbian protestors have marched in Pristina, angrily denouncing the United States and withdrawing their ambassador to the US.Ethnic Albanians claim they are descended from the ancient Illyrians, and therefore the original inhabitants of Kosovo. As is often the case in claims of this nature, this argument only has real meaning if modern Albanians can: a) Establish and prove the date when they believe they were the legitimate occupiers of the area, and when they were illegitimately replaced. b) Prove that their descendents actually occupied that specific geographic area, not an adjacent one. c) Prove that it was the Serbs exclusively that displaced them, and not a series of conflicts, expulsions, occupations, etc, by the Serbs and others that deprived them of their land. d) Prove ethnic descent. d) Maintain a majority of ethnic purity and prove it. e) Demonstrate either: a significant degree of autonomous existence in the specified area, or consistent effort to re-establish your claim. f) Demonstrate due diligence for all of the above factors from the time of your expulsion until now. Most, if not all of these facts are conveniently impossible to prove. Besides, there already is an independent Albania.

Today, the supposedly disbanded KLA (Kosovar Liberation Army), and Albanian organization, is engaged in terrorism, arms running, drug smuggling and human trafficking. Major figures in the KLA have documented links to Al-Qaeda, and Iran. The Kosovo economy is a joke with the majority of its citizens unemployed and therefore no way to feed their people without aid from (you guessed it) the United States and European Union. Furthermore, Albanian Muslims have engaged in systematic destruction of Serbian Christians sites, many centuries old, designed not only to eradicate all Serbian Christians, but any memory of their presence in Kosovo.

Several countries including Spain, Greece, Romania Russia and China have refused to recognize Kosovo on the grounds that this will embolden separatist movements in their countries. The final and most regrettable part of this whole charade (hinted at earlier) is the precedent it sets. If the world entertained this bogus claim, who’s safe, and who’s next?

Answer: Jerusalem.

John Cleese Correction

Posted in Uncategorized on February 18, 2008 by nedyounger

Since posting a link to “John Cleese’s Letter to America,” I have come to find out that he probably did not write it. The original link at starrgazr.wordpress.com/2008/02/15/john-cleese-letter-to-america is no longer operative. The conent of the letter can still be found at:

  http://www.ballot.com/hotwire/291-john-cleese-letter-america.html

 

The “letter” is still funny however. Anybody know who really wrote it?

“Just” Plagiarism

Posted in Government, Truth in the Details on February 18, 2008 by nedyounger

 

Barack Obama has been extolled as a great orator, yet criticized for being all flash and no substance. On February 16 in Wisconsin, Obama gave a speech strangely similar to a speech given by then Massachusetts gubernatorial candidate Deval Johnson in October of 2006.

  

When the striking similarity was pointed out, Obama explained “I’m sure I should have given credit to Patrick,” but, “I really don’t think this is too big of a deal.”

 

Commentators have pointed out that Johnson apparently gave Obama permission to use “his” words, but that hardly alleviates Obama’s responsibility to give credit where credit is due.

No wonder some people don’t think downloading music from the internet without paying for it, or downloading a research paper and calling it your own isn’t stealing.

 

Barkley Calls Republicans “Fake Christians”

Posted in Religion, Sports on February 18, 2008 by nedyounger

 

 

Former NBA star and current NBA announcer Charles Barkley appeared on CNN’s’ The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer on February 15.

Barkley wasn’t there to discuss basketball however; he was there to discuss politics. Bible-believing Christians will find his comments quite revealing, and patently offensive. “[B]ut I don’t like the way the Republicans are taking this country,” Barkley said. “Every time I hear the word conservative it makes me sick to my stomach because they’re really just fake Christians, as I call them. That’s all they are.” 

To his credit, Wolf Blitzer asked Barkley to elaborate. He did.

 “Well, I think they want to be judge and jury,” Barkley said. “Like, I’m for gay marriage. It’s none of my business if gay people want to get married. I’m pro-choice. And I think these Christians, first of all, they’re not supposed to judge other people. But they’re the most hypocritical judge of people we have in the country. And it bugs the hell out of me. They act like they’re Christians. They’re not forgiving at all.” 

Barkley also suggested that Christians should read the part of the Bible where it says “they’re not supposed to judge other people,” (apparently in reference to Matthew 7:1). But it is very obvious that Barkley doesn’t read the Bible himself or he would know that the Jesus is primarily addressing hypocrisy in Matthew chapter seven (read verse two Charles), and that Christians are commanded to judge with righteous judgment (John 7:24).

When Wolf Blitzer pointed out that Barkley was likely to get some negative feedback from these comments, he responded: “They can’t do anything to me, I don’t work for them.” 

Barkley went on to say that he intends to run for governor of Alabama in 2014. It will be interesting to see if he can still say “I don’t work for them” then.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.